SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill who wrote (19083)8/9/2002 12:44:31 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) of 21057
 
"This is no one's business but ours," he said. "I think anyone under the age of 18 who has a baby shouldn't have her name printed in the newspaper."

It seems to me that if the birth mother, regardless of age, has made no effort to conceal the pregnancy and has made reasonable (non-public)attempts to locate and notify the father, then the law should remove his parental rights a priori, where adoption procedures are indicated.

and there should be no need to and the birth father was too uninvolved to notice.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News