SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (149375)8/9/2002 2:02:19 PM
From: Yousef  Read Replies (1) of 1580053
 
Ted,

Re: "Yousef, that's right."

Your logic seems very faulty to me, Ted ... These are the FACTS:

1) Very few countries have nuclear weapons (USA, Russia, China, India, Pakistan,
England, France, Israel, maybe I missed another one).

2) Star wars (when complete) is designed to prevent missiles (nuclear/chemical/...) from hitting
the USA.

3) As time goes on, more and more countries will develop or acquire nuclear/chemical
weapons. Terrorist groups will also acquire them.

It seems to me, Ted ... that the fewer countries that have these weapons, the
less likely that one will be launched against the USA. To me, the best way to
prevent the need for a "star wars defense" is if NO countries have missile and
nuclear/chemical capabilities. Doesn't this make sense to you ??

Make It So,
Yousef
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext