Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elsewhere who wrote (36711)	8/9/2002 4:54:30 PM
From: Spytrdr	Read Replies (1) of 281500

that is false. unless you count the devastation and destruction inflicted by the Allies to fight Germany as his direct fault. it's like saying that the murderous destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was caused by the japanese emperor. A.H. was a kindergarten bully-boy compared to Stalin. and yet his name is anathema today, but the other's is not. why? simple, because Stalin was an ally, while A.H./Germany was becoming too powerful for the british liking (divide et impera). <<Everyone knows what the Holocaust was, but, Amis points out, there is no name for and comparatively little public awareness of the killing that took place in the Soviet Union between 1917 and 1933, when 20 million died under a Bolshevik regime that ruled as if waging war against its own people. Why?>> amazon.com amazon.com amazon.com amazon.com ___ <<causing much more external destruction than Stalin>>

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next