SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (16455)8/11/2002 12:59:08 PM
From: Math Junkie  Read Replies (1) of 42834
 
It sounds like you want to expense stock buy-backs.

You wrote, "options REQUIRE a company to buy back shares to keep dilution at bay. "

I just want to point out that keeping dilution at bay is not required, it's optional.

Secondly, when you talk about the opportunity costs from not having the buy-back funds available to build the company, you're assuming that using the cash for that purpose would have been effective in building the business. But companies have a tendency to time the buy-backs when stock prices and business are weak, so that assumption may not be valid.

You could also use the opportunity cost argument against dividends. A stock buy-back has a similar effect to paying a dividend, because if for example a company buys back 1% of its stock, the remaining stock is 1% more valuable than it would have been. For a shareholder, a buy-back is even better than a dividend, because it gives the shareholder the opportunity to defer the tax impact until later (by continuing to hold all his shares), and the opportunity to have it taxed at capital gains rates instead of as ordinary income.

The whole point of this discussion is to benefit the shareholders, is it not?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext