SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT)
AMAT 249.89+3.1%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cary Salsberg who wrote (2248)8/11/2002 3:09:28 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (2) of 25522
 
If the thin client business is so promising, why did IBM and the other companies get out? This is the last hurrah of the mainframe, dumb terminal architecture.

That article implies the thin client architecture reverts back to the big mainframe and terminal configuration. I don't believe thats the case- the thin client architecture is actually a 3-tier, with the mainframe crunching the big numbers for the centralized database, then the middle tier for content, personalization, some analytics and collaboration- then the thin client. The fact that the client is now thin means more clients can be supported than before... mobile devices and the like for warehouses, etc.

This is just a gut feel but everytime we move to a new computing architecture, ex the original mainframe model to client/server, and now client/server to n-tier- we use more processors and chips, maybe its due to overhead... also the middle tier is a lot of java.

The piece was from Barrons, correct? Since they like Orcl and SAP in their tech picklist, thats something of an endorsement for the new architecture since moving off c/s to the internet architectures is the new push for orcl (apps) and SAP.
Lizzie
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext