Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (37085)	8/11/2002 9:52:27 PM
From: SirRealist	Read Replies (2) of 281500

I agree about the inspectors. But on Ritter, the challenges mostly are directed at his integrity, with claims that defectors' integrity is automatically greater. (no way they could be moles or decoys, right?) Consider the content of Ritter's claims. Look at the no-fly zones: news.bbc.co.uk Do you suppose we might even have drones over the remaining zone? Do you think there might be some truth to the claim that fissionable materials could be identifiable via our surveillance? I hope our Congress asks these questions and is provided answers, with evidence presented them.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next