The only people on SI who do not respect me are Muslim lovers, Canadian Pump and Dump promoters both in the newsletter industry as well as the brokerage industry that infect SI, and the mysoginists. I don't care if they respect me or not.
I don't post SI, SH, RB or anywhere for anyone's benefit other than my own, whether I'm feeling altruistic and sharing, or just plain aghast because of the gall of some numbnuts on these threads---male or brassy bearing females ignorance that elicits a comeback of sorts.
RE: my monthly contribution to another newsletter as well as being the editor of the Q&A section for them, I doubt you'd be interested.
You see,my feature only deals with "how to discover and recover above ground gold for LESS THAN $20 an ounce and do it on a regular and steady basis, like I have for the last 12 years. The trends I follow are scrap availability and where, and economics of end product pricing after discovery & recovery is ancillary.
The newsletter editor, my buddy Zack, tells me that free subscriptions to his newsletter have been growing steadily, since he began publishing it in January 2002. I gave him my book buyer list from the last 12 years to help him get launched in his affiliate efforts. It's an optin.
From reading your alternately sarcastic and then sacchrine posts to me over the last 18 months or so, I'd wager you don't want anything remotely resembling gold recycling information. You like the leverage in equities, and that is NOT my hot button.
Your public track record says you only want " buy this and make a bazillion dollars in 2 weeks time" bullpuckey from people who want to line their pockets with subscription fees.
Why you aren't content at the tremendous loan shark margins you are able to legally extract from the recession battered consumer is beyond me. How much is enough, Tom? You can only wear one pair of Adidas at a time, yes?
Sorry, but no dice. The last thing I want to deal with is to comments about my tried and tested gold investment program as a gold recycler.
As far as "base metals" and your disinterest therein... would it interest you any to know that tantalum sold for over $420 a AV POUND in the last 12 mo's? (not as boring as copper fundamentals in the surging herd rush headlong into WTC...but)
To help you incase someone else is borrowing your calculator, Tantalaum's price surge works out to:
$420 / 16oz to av # or $26.25 PER AV OZ or $28.81 per TROY oz. THOSE NUMBERS Beat the hell outta silver's piddly $4.xx per t/oz, yes? (That Tantalum move was from $20 per pound btw...)
I know what you want, and I've politely told you "No, thank you!" once already. Now it's twice.
I repeat: my written and available to the public expertise are: INEXPENSIVE PURSUIT AND ACQUISITIONS OF: Gold Diamonds Tantalum Platinum, Palladium.
Due to extremely low costs of acquiring each of the above 4 physically, I deploy their profits into the equity sector which interests you primarily. Equities are a secondary interest to me. And I don't publically talk about my gold picks as I'm still accumulating judiciously. One of My diamond selections are public knowledge.
Sorry, no smorgasbord here...just the above 4 topics... ...and just as you noted previously, silver didn't make the cut. It is STILL a nuisance metal in my line of work.
g_t
Since you |