All insults, and no answers: Lazy Tommie the Spammer, you're all hat and no cattle... even after taking the time to collect our series of posts (me asking questions, and you ignoring them and spamming the thread with the same article over and over and over) where surely you must have READ them, you still refuse to post any honest thoughts or opinions.
Next time, try to actually use thought before posting. I know it's a radical concept for you, but try to *engage* in reason, not merely hurl Jeremiads from your cave.
My answer to your original posted Novak article:
Message 17853443
"Crooked books are crooked books, and Washington takes the cake in that department for the shear magnitude of it's fraud over most of what's happened recently in corporate America.
I notice that you've made no attempt to defend the off-balance sheet 'smoke and mirrors accounting' chicanery of Reagan/Bush... or of the current administration either."
After your non-responsive reply-Spam, my second reply:
Message 17854084
"As usual, you ignore all questions (so we may assume that you agree with my posts concerning Reagan/Bush and current administration's fraudulent budget accounting, and 'pie-in-the-sky' economic assumptions) since you choose not to refute them.
...And then you merely repost the same article again (Novak's) which only posited that Clinton under-estimated corporate profit growth... a far less egregious offense than 'cooking the books' on the entire US national budget (and it's associated deficits)."
My near final substantive attempt to pull an honest answer from you:
Message 17858123
"From my post:
"I notice that you've made no attempt to defend the off-balance sheet 'smoke and mirrors accounting' chicanery of Reagan/Bush... or of the current administration either."
Implied question from the post: Do you defend the budget tricks (non-GAAP accounting, 'off-balance sheet' budgeting tricks, robbing from trust funds to disguise size of deficits, fraudulent economic projections) so famously employed during the Reagan/Bush years... or during our current Bush era?
New question: Do you think Clinton's overestimating of *corporate* growth rates (by, what was it Novak claimed? 10%?) is as egregious a fraud as the Reagan/Bush budget tricks on our *nation's* books... or the current Bush's 'rosey growth' projected numbers for future years, which even CBO and GAO economists (not to mention, private economists) refuse to use, and reject out of hand?"
>>> Poor Tommie the Spammer, all you posted was repeated Spam... attempting to reason with you is like trying to talk with a Cow... all one gets back is 'Moo, Moo, Moo'.
>>> If you don't want to take the time attempting to post thoughtful comments instead of Spam... well then fine: we'll all just ignore anymore non-responsive Spam from you. |
