Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: SpecialK who wrote (38897)	8/12/2002 3:40:17 PM
From: TimbaBear	Read Replies (1) of 52237

SpecialK How about expensing when options are exercised? That might make more sense. I'm in favor of regulatory change that 1). requires that there be no dilution due to the exercise of options and 2). requires the cost of shares purchased to prevent said dilution to be expensed. Trying to do who-do-voodoo with Black-Scholes or any other such crystal ball gazing is ridiculous. The real cost of options is the cost that is attempting to be cast off upon the shareholder. The company is in business, let it expense whatever incentive programs it wishes to implement is a fair and above board manner that let's everyone see the true cost of doing that business, not just those costs the company hasn't found a creative way not to count. TimbaBear

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next