SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Alighieri who wrote (149551)8/13/2002 10:49:11 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (3) of 1580264
 
Why has Bush not made this case if it is so clear to you? Why is the world having so much trouble seeing this obvious justification?

Bush hasn't made any ATTEMPT at selling it to the world. If he DOES make an attempt, a significant part of the world will come along -- NOT that it matters. WE are the targets of Saddam, NOT them. We don't NEED them, they can just make it easier. As a true leader, Bush will do whatever is necessary to defend against Saddam, with or without support of the world community. This, is true leadership.

But to answer your question, the instant the weapons inspectors were refused unfettered access, any COMPETENT president would have taken decisive action. That wasn't done. However, we are well within our rights to do what is necessary to get weapons inspections back in place.

If we are unable to do so through negotiations, we will need to kill Saddam and those who support him.

Again, my question to you is "What constitutes 'legal' justification?"
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News