SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 159.42-1.2%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: slacker711 who wrote (123131)8/13/2002 12:40:26 PM
From: Wyätt Gwyön  Read Replies (1) of 152472
 
it doesnt really matter to me if options are expensed or not. It makes no difference in the long-run intrinsic value of a company.

so, would you say that if a company paid all of its bills in stocks, that makes no difference to the long-run intrinsic value and therefore it "doesn't really matter" whether those noncash payments are expensed?

you know, if you follow the arguments of the option-expense skeptics to their logical conclusion, cos shouldn't even expense their cash outlays. after all, that money, once removed from the co treasury, will simply reduce the co's per-share book value (just as share dilution via options or stock issuance would), so in the "long run" maybe it doesn't matter.

btw, the distinction between options and simple stock issuance is a lot grayer than some may imagine. numerous cos issue options struck well below current market prices.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext