SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (54612)8/13/2002 3:04:33 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
There is, I think, a real question about maintaining our humanity if we abandon our belief in the spiritual

It seems to me, as well, that it's about our humanity, our human spirit. The question is whether religion is THE path or A path or whether it leads us in the opposite direction.

In an earlier discussion on this subject I recall some difference in how people looked at humanity. I did not check the dictionary then but I think it illustrates the underlying difference at that time.

Main Entry: hu·man·i·ty
1 : the quality or state of being humane
2 a : the quality or state of being human

I recall a POV that, since human traits are both noble and ignoble, that humanity encompassed both. I prefer to look at definition number one and focus on that which is best about humans.

Main Entry: hu·man·ism
3 : a doctrine, attitude, or way of life centered on human interests or values; especially : a philosophy that usually rejects supernaturalism and stresses an individual's dignity and worth and capacity for self-realization through reason

Contemporary religions have elements that reinforce both noble and ignoble aspects of humanity. To the extent that you practice a religion that is uplifting, your humanity is elevated. To the extend that you follow a religion that is dehumanizing, you are, at best, stunted in your spiritual growth, at worst, degraded.

Glorifying religion without making those distinctions is not constructive, IMO. Your point said "spiritual" rather than "religious." I don't know if that distinction was intentional or not, but I consider it important. I don't think that humanity will progress until and unless we reject those aspects of religion that pull us down. It's important not to treat religion as a proxy for the human spirit. We need to revere what is best about the human race and encourage our spirituality, not get hung up on religion. Religion may be a path to a healthy and productive society, but it is not the only path, and for it to be successful as a path, it needs to jettison its negatives. Whenever one treats religion as sacrosanct, one is obviating the opportunity to jettison that part that is not conducive to humanity.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext