SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT)
AMAT 223.95+1.7%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gottfried who wrote (2432)8/15/2002 12:33:29 PM
From: Math Junkie  Read Replies (2) of 25522
 
"Richard, you can't learn PnF without a little pain, not because it's difficult, but because it's weird."

That's why I'm hoping to find out to what extent the results justify the effort.

"You'd have to define 'whipsaw'."

I assume that PnF is oriented toward swing trading, as I am. I would count it as a whipsaw if PnF gave a sell signal when the market was lower than the previous buy signal, and vice versa.

"PnF charts whipsaw less than conventional charts because of the built-in treshold."

That's the information I'm looking for. Can you venture a guess as to what percentage of the signals turn out to be whipsaws? 25%? 10%?

When you invite people sailing, do you make them learn how to tie bowlines, reefing knots, clove hitches, and cleat knots first? Do you expect them to learn about coming about, jibing, flying a spinnaker, hiking out, backing the jib, right-of-way rules, etc., before they set foot on your boat? A better analogy would be if you had been inviting him to sign up for a course in sailing. <g>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext