Booms, Busts, and Recoveries Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (22678)	8/15/2002 3:50:08 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (3) of 74559

My explanation is more benevolent than yours. Typically when the US has become involved in a way, we've been better off afterwards because we accomplished something of value. Not every time, just most of the time. We find armaments necessary to keep the grabby hands of the Helen Clarks of the world off our goodies. People like her look at rich people, and think that if you make them poor then poor people will be richer. We don't like fighting, but we do it very well. Afterwards, we bring first charity -- food and medicine, and then a better way of life -- democracy and capitalism, all the good things. That's what we're doing for Afghanistan, that's what we have planned for Iraq. There's a reason that thousands of immigrants flock to the United States every year. We make the world a better place. And we welcome them. They make us a better place. China, for example, is a place people are trying to get out of. Sorry, Jay.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next