War Message Board - Msg: 17884546

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : War

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Thomas M. who wrote (16334)	8/16/2002 12:00:42 AM
From: Angler	Read Replies (1) of 23908

That his neighbors "felt that Saddam was a threat and support OUR war" would have been better poised as "THEIR" war. I always felt that we went in to protect their lives and our interests in the Gulf but no it seems that we are forcing the issue now on our own behalf ignoring the others. It seems we might be overstepping our bounds. That is why it appears to me good sense that we leave Saddam alone after he agrees to some kind of inspection. Let his neighbors cry out for help before we meddle in the region or is oil the only thing that makes us belligerent? We can't bear that he might have the atom bomb, but others in East have it. If we destroy Saddam will we have any guarantees that some other small state or even a future Iraqui leader will not come up with the means. Should we have to take them all out? Iran, North Korea and Iraq? Saddam has not been proven to be part of the terrorist group that struck us 9/11. Or has he? Angler

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next