Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 48.38

-0.7%

3:56 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (169552)	8/17/2002 11:11:57 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (2) of 186894

RE:"The implication here is that you DON'T think it's frivolous." LOL, you haven't been paying attention. I'm not a big fan of class action lawsuits. I just saw this coming a year ago when boxmakers were selling P4s w/SDRAM for top dollar, based on Mhz. RE"Clock speed has been a measurement standard ever since the microprocessor was invented. If Intel Legal really wanted to take off the gloves, they'd sue AMD for that ill-defined "QuantiSpeed" nonsense" Actually that works against the boxmakers case. They were selling boxes for more money based on Mhz when in fact those boxes were actually slower in performance than the P-IIIs and Athlons they were selling for less money. That is what the lawsuit is about. Maybe this one goes away. Dunno. Jim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next