Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 45.51

+10.7%

Jan 9 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (169552)	8/18/2002 8:50:09 AM
From: Charles Gryba	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Tench, sorry to but in but where Intel was deceptive is the fact that it had trained consumers to expect each successive cpu to have a higher IPC and higher frequencies that its predecessor. All of a sudden they abandon that philosophy with no mention anywhere. Consumers that were used to the 286->386->486->Pentium->Pentium2->Pentium3 line of cpus were obviously expecting a similar boost of ipc and frequency from the P4. What they got with Wilamette was a disgrace. I am not faulting Intel for releasing the P4, they had to in order to compete with the Athlon but they should have been more truthful to the consumer. C

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next