War Message Board - Msg: 17892557

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : War

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (16477)	8/18/2002 10:58:32 PM
From: Eashoa' M'sheekha	Read Replies (2) of 23908

If My Memory Serves....... You will recall the term " massacre " was attributed to an interview on CNN of a Pal. representative being interviewed and saying he thought the number dead could be as high as 500. NEVER in the interview did he state there was a " massacre " and never did he use the term " massacre ". However,the JP reported that he stated there was a "massacre " ,and that's where the whole thing got started and snowballed from there. This was discussed at length on the FADG , but it was sometime well after the hullabaloo that these facts came to the forefront. THAT"S what I meant by the " The origin of the Jenin " massacre " story ". I am aware of events during and after and we discussed them at length on the FADG as well. My post was to clarify the issue regarding the origin of the term " massacre " relating to Jenin , since many were quick to scoff at the whole affair in cynical fashion afterward ,using the terms " nossacre " and " Jeningrad " , which I find equally repulsive and insensitive, given the roots mentioned. Does that clarify things? PS: If necessary I can try to dig up the information from that time period when I get an op.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next