SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Alighieri who wrote (149963)8/19/2002 2:04:42 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 1570079
 
Part 1 of your question: I don't know, but I would hope that we do with all our might and money

How could we possibly have evidence that "which supports the foregone conclusion that Saddam is out to attack the US."? Does our might and money allow us to read minds?

Part 2 of your question: You can't go around the world attacking other countries without evidence.

You can indeed attack countries where you don't have incontrovertible evidence that they are eventually going to attack you. You can attack them if they attack someone else. One that conflict starts a cease fire agreement puts in on hold until its violated. Any attack on Iraq now would be a response to its attack on Kuwait, delayed by the ceasefire agreement, but started because that agreement was violated.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext