SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (149956)8/19/2002 8:02:53 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) of 1570286
 
Tim, you mentioned in another post that most wars have not been declared by Congress but rather pretty much initiated by the President. That's true for many of our wars; however neither does it make it right that Bush should declare a war on Iraq nor was it the intent of our founders. They asserted that Congress shall be the body responsible for declaring wars, not presidents.

What makes this attack on Iraq very dangerous from a Constitutional point of view is that Bush thinks he has the authority to move ahead without Congress's approval, developing his war plans within the context of the war on terrorism.........a war seemingly without end. He apparently is not interested in what Congress thinks.......a dangerous precedent. It runs the risk of having a president who becomes all consumed with the powers to be had waging war.

For that reason, I, for one, do not believe the president should ever take it upon himself to declare war; that the founders' instincts on this issue were good ones. Congress, must be the body that makes that decision, particularly when the wisdom of such a move is questionable as it is in this one.

ted
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext