SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 45.51+10.7%Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill Jackson who wrote (169663)8/21/2002 1:34:41 AM
From: milo_morai  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
<font color=green>The Athlon XP 2600+ we tested seemed to run relatively cool, considering its high clock speed. The 2200+ we tested back in June consistently ran between 44 and 50 degrees Celsius, but the 2600+ we've got today hovered between 35 and 39 degrees Celsius. Our methods for measuring temperature were by no means "scientific" though, and this time around we're using a much better cooler, which should account for some of the difference. The additional 4 square millimeters of contact area probably helps a bit as well. Regardless, the difference seemed rather substantial, so I queried our contact at AMD as to whether or not the changes made to core had a significant impact on temperature. His response was, "I don't have a technical explanation other than our engineers have tweaked the core with all that we've discussed. The end result was a cooler, faster CPU."

hothardware.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext