Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: i-node who wrote (150108)	8/21/2002 12:59:12 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) of 1582695

Why did the Sup. Ct. intercede in a national election.......its outside their jurisdiction? Your remark is irrelevent in this context, I'm not sure why you bring this up. However, since you brought it up, the US Supreme Court wasn't doing anything unusual -- it granted cert in an appeal from a lower court. Happens all the time. Uh-uh! Mr. Bush who ran on a states' rights platform went running to the Sup. Ct. and asked for their help when the state supreme court didn't vote his way. Their election intercession notwithstanding, the normal role of the Court is to review cases on which lower courts have ruled. Apparently, no one has brought a case against Congress attacking their abdication of responsibilities. Don't you think it is strange that if presidents are going to war without the appropriate congressional approval no one has seen fit to bring suit on constitutional grounds? I think it is a clear indication that NOBODY with standing agrees with you on this issue... Not at all......, many issues that should be brought in front of the courts have not been. However, it probably will be after this war.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next