Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jcky who wrote (39292)	8/21/2002 5:09:37 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (4) of 281500

If the Bush administration can demonstrate complicity between Iraq and al-Qaida How much of a connection would it take to satisfy you? Do you need proof that Saddam was behind 9/11 or would you be satisfied with proof that Saddam aided and abetted Al Qaeda in general, or even indirectly? How strong does the evidence need to be? Some, I see, after watching the OBL tape where he crows about 9/11, maintain that his comments are insufficient to connect the dots. The fact that the hijackers were Al Qaeda members, that OBL was the head of Al Qaeda, and that he was very pleased with the results are not sufficient. Others will discount all evidence as suspect because they do not trust this administration. As for me, the fact that Saddam bankrolls secular terrorists who are allied with Islamist terrorists, including Al Qaeda, is enough. The friend of my enemy is, in this case, my enemy.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next