SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rollcast... who wrote (39388)8/22/2002 10:43:16 AM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
I suppose I could add equivalent language and generalizations to my posts about Win's team... phrases like "appeasement cowards", "quasi-lib radicals more interested in creating the slightest chance of another, even more damaging attack than 9/11"... Maybe just plain "blame America first, self hating dems hoping, deep in their hearts, that America will fail to secure itself from further attacks like 9/11..."

The thread is Ken's to run as he pleases and us to stay or leave as we are pleased or displeased with his stewardship.

If I were running it, however, I would consider Win's comments just inside the line and your's just outside. The content of yours which goes over the line is the notion that critics hope " . . that America will fail to secure itself from further attacks like 9/11>"

That's tantamount to the claim that Bush's critics are traitors. That's over the line.

But then I don't run the thread.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News