SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Corvis Corporation (CORV)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jeff Jordan who wrote (1566)8/22/2002 12:34:46 PM
From: tech101  Read Replies (1) of 2772
 
Nortel's Mumford Savors Switches

AUGUST 22, 2002

SAN JOSE, Calif. -- Future telecom networks will see voice, video, and data come together over an optical switched core, according to Greg Mumford, CTO of Nortel Networks Corp. (NYSE/Toronto: NT - message board) (see Nortel Bets on Mumford ). Mumford spoke here at Opticon 2002 on Wednesday.

Contrary to comments made earlier this week by former UUNet chief scientist Michael O'Dell (see O'Dell: Voice and Data Don't Mix ), Mumford says it's inevitable that data and voice are going to converge in carrier networks.

"You might say that culture won't let us bring voice and data together.... but services will demand it," says Mumford. Business customers want multimedia content and mobile services, he says, and that's going to force carriers to continue to move from "costly separated networks to a shared network infrastructure."

One thing Mumford and O'Dell have in common is the belief in a technology that most in the industry think is in hibernation. Mumford, for example, sees business customers' demands for multimedia content and mobile services driving the adoption of optical switches by carriers.

His belief in optical switches runs counter to most industry opinion, which has it that the market for optical core technology has been put on hold indefinitely (see Nortel Shuts Optical Switch Effort , No Riches From Optical Switches , Cuts for Tellium? , and Core Optical Startups Chill Out ).

Ultimately, Mumford argues that all networks -- be they enterprise or carrier, wireline or wireless -- will need to run atop an optical core that supports voice, video, and data, consolidating network resources and saving costs all round.

Mumford says the migration to optical-switched cores is happening already. Sprint Corp. (NYSE: FON - message board) upgraded from a circuit-based to a packet-based network, replacing 132 existing central offices with 31 switching sites, he says (see Sprint, Nortel Combine Sales Efforts ).

Also, a financial company in New York went from duplicating dozens of databases in high-rent, hard-to-each locations to creating a large, offsite storage area network (SAN) that is accessible via high-bandwidth connections, Mumford recounts.

That application is significant, in Mumford's mind: "They're using the network to substitute for [computer] processing power." Once more enterprises adopt applications like SANs that call for big bandwidth, they'll start to move to carrier networks as well, he predicts.

Mumford envisions other aspects of these new networks, including optical Ethernet links to connect enterprise local area networks (LANs). These data-ready pipes will be run by software that can manage a network, saving the cost of sending technicians to do things such as change throughput rate on a connection, he says.

In the core, Mumford sees big optical switches with electronics for traffic aggregation, node consolidation, and service grooming. These switches will handle a broad mix of line systems from short reach to ultra long reach, from 2.5-Gbit/s connections to giant 40-Gbit/s pipes.

Protocols such as ESCON, Ethernet, and Sonet will all need to be supported in one switch, Mumford says. That's part of Nortel's pitch for its own Optera HDX switch, which sources say hasn't been gaining the ground Nortel had hoped it would (see Nortel's HDX is Here ).

This part of Mumford's speech gave some attendees pause. "It sounds like they're adopting a 'God-box' approach to long-haul switching," says Paul Harrison, VP of marketing for Xtera Communications Inc., a long-haul DWDM equipment maker. Using one switch to handle transport and network services in the core narrows the field of vendors from which carriers can choose, he says. "I think service providers want more choice, not less."

Mumford, however, believes that as enterprise networks and carrier networks start looking more and more similar, the switches at the core must be able to handle anything. "If you need a switch for every different service, then you need a network for every different service, and you'll never get economies of scale that way," he says.

Meanwhile, Mumford says Nortel isn't advocating tearing apart existing networks to redo things. New technologies such as 40-Gbit/s long-haul links will need to be added piece by piece where they're economically viable. "I can't imagine somebody building a 40-gig overlay network [these days]," Mumford says.

During a question-and-answer session after his keynote, Mumford acknowledged that Nortel has some work to do to address ongoing market needs. "We have the packetized portfolio now, we need to move it to an MPLS product set," he says.

"We also need to get the HDX out there and demonstrate it, even in this time when no one's buying much optical," he says.

After his keynote, Mumford told Light Reading that carrier spending is bound to pick up, but only after carriers improve their cash flow, something that unfortunately has stopped their buying patterns cold.

"They need to provide new services for new revenues," Mumford maintains. As new services are added, more equipment will be needed to support the evolving network traffic, he says.

On that note, Mumford again bangs the drum for converged, efficient networks. "What are communications systems for if they don't bring people together and get them off the roads and out of the air?" he asks.

— Phil Harvey, Senior Editor, Light Reading
lightreading.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext