THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: one_less who wrote (19734)	8/23/2002 4:11:26 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) of 21057

Verbal assault should be actionable. IMO. What do you mean by "verbal assault"? If I call TP a lying SOB, is that verbal assault? How about if I say that about Bush? Clinton? If I say Clinton lied about having sex with Monica, is that verbal assault? How about one of Vidrine's harangues against Jews? Or one the equivalent harangues against Muslims that have been posted? That slope you're standing on is mighty slippery. I like that Supreme Court's stance (at least until now); If the exercise of free speech does not create clear and present danger of violence, it's legal. Remember, any ground you abandon, the gov't will happily take.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next