SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 40.34-2.6%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan3 who wrote (169918)8/24/2002 1:35:42 PM
From: tcmay  Read Replies (3) of 186894
 
Which is more fraudulent?:

* Labelling a PC as running at 2.53 GHz, which is what it actually runs at, or,

* Labelling a PC as a "2600+", which is _not_ what it actually runs at?

Intel has a powerful defense in this typical lawyer lawsuit: it says its machines run at 2.2 GHz, 2.4 GHz, 2.6 GHz, etc....and, surprise, they actually DO run at these speeds. How fast they run applications is for benchmark voodoo ninjas to argue about. (But the results for the P4 are clearly very, very good as compared to the fastest Athwipes.)

AMD is the one who should be running scared. Not only can their fastest Athwipes not keep up, but they started falsely implying that their macines are running at "2600 MHz," the clear insinuation of the "2600+" moniker (or should I use the word "monica"?).

--Tim May
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext