Bear - you are the antithesis of a gentleman
Look it up.
My last meaningful post about HOMS was the May 1, 2001 where I was challenging Tony to be more thorough with his investigations of HOMS.
BTW: on May 1 2001, HOMS was at 35.
Everything I posted about HOMS I believed at the time I posted it. Today there are only 1 or 2 things I posted that, with the clarity of hindsight, I regret I posted; not because I lied when I posted it (which I didn't, I believed in what I was posting), but rather that time has shown my belief to be incorrect.
I believe that all of my opinions I posted as opinions, not as facts.
As to the stock being a good investment, I repeatedly said the stock was volatile, and that I thought Tony was crazy to tell people to short HOMS when it was at 20; when my meager skills at T/A were screaming that short term the stock was headed to 30 (and it did go to 35+).
Now, I like to short stocks (though I believe I never shorted HOMS) but most people (like me) can't afford to ride out a rise in a short position from 20 to 35.
Why am I responding to you?
Just wanted to say I re-read my posts and I stand by them as what I believed at the time.
So there, bppppphhhhht!
You all be careful out there
Ray |
