Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 41.41

+2.2%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Harold Engstrom who wrote (170126)	8/27/2002 12:57:06 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (3) of 186894

Harold, <What is the alternative to P4/Xeon when the code is written for a 2000 box and not transportable to a Unix box?> How much power do you need? My guess is that for large transaction-based applications, your best bet is a few quad-Xeon servers with lots and lots of memory. But it's hard to come up with the right answer for you without knowing the specifics of your needs. Maybe quad-Xeon servers are overkill for you. I don't know. Anyway, if your needs are that huge, then yes, 64-bit Itanium 2 servers will indeed blow away Xeon servers. But the cost only makes sense for real heavy loads or high-end stuff. And as I'm fond of saying, it all depends on what your definition of "high-end" is. My guess is that by even asking on these forums, your needs aren't that huge. In that case, dual Xeon boxes will probably fit your needs very well. And you definitely won't need 64-bit processing. Tenchusatsu P.S. - I work for Intel, so my views are obviously going to be biased. ;-) Just remember that these are my own opinions, not necessarily that of my employer. And I could be way off in my advice, so take it for what it's worth.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next