SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (150411)8/27/2002 8:29:34 AM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (1) of 1584937
 
How is it you see THIS as a dangerous scenario, but you don't see Saddam's development of nukes as "dangerous"? If control of Pakistan's nukes is lost, it is going to be up to the United States to deal with the problem.

I do....I just don't agree with the methods for controlling the problem(s). I also don't think there is any doctrine that entitles any nation to take pre-emptive action against another nation. By the president men's policies it should be ok for either India or Pakistan to execute pre-emptive actions against one another. They each have nukes and are sworn enemies, which is more that we can say about Iraq today. How do you put the toothpaste back in the tube if the US behaves in so rogue a manner?

Al
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News