SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (150411)8/27/2002 12:08:22 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) of 1584949
 
How is it you see THIS as a dangerous scenario, but you don't see Saddam's development of nukes as "dangerous"? If control of Pakistan's nukes is lost, it is going to be up to the United States to deal with the problem. Same with Iraq. And if WE'RE going to have to control them later, we may as well take control of them now, before our population becomes a target.

Your position is inconsistent.

No, your and your fellow Reps. are the ones inconsistent. Pak. has both nukes and missiles. Sodom doesn't have either. Pak. under the current leadership is as much a threat to our well being as Sodom. Their dictator is as much a tyrant as Sodom. The Pak. are also Muslim and have many Muslim fundamentalists. Yet, we are "allies" with Pak. and hate Sodom. You think that's consistent.........I think not!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News