SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (55798)8/29/2002 10:44:11 PM
From: J. C. Dithers  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
Now come on, I just had said you don't have make an announcement of something like that.

The relevant question with your friend would be, did he disclose his conviction when he was hired? I believe most employers ask about any criminal convictions or felonies on application blanks. If they don't ask, you need not tell. The employer should be able to find out that information anyway on a routine background check. Employers are interested in such facts for good reason.

The problem (for me) is when he or anyone else lies about it, or tries to conceal it. Again, he does not have to volunteer it. I suppose you might say that he can lie to friends and neighbors, as it is none of their business, although that seems hardly praiseworthy.

The old expression, "Don't do the crime if you can't do the time," applies here. If you believe you were in the right and that your conviction was unjust ... then why lie about it? To anyone?

The idea of changing your name, legally, was for people who had names that could be embarrassing, such as "John Fuchs, " or perhaps for people who wished to move away from an ethnic identification, or for other innocuous motives. I don't think the legal right was ever intended to apply to persons who were trying to conceal an unsavory past. I don't have any idea what the legalities of a name change involve, or whether your motive is considered relevant by the court. I kind of think motive must be relevant, or else it wouldn't be a court matter.

Anyway, I am not going to become a big fan of people who try to hide their past actions behind smoke and mirrors.

(I might make an exception for first-time sweet roll thiefs).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext