SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elsewhere who wrote (41072)8/30/2002 9:11:23 PM
From: epsteinbd  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
"If the UN decides action against Irak I wouldn't oppose it", you say.

And if Doctor Assad vetoes against invasion, together with some other Doctors of the Faith friends of his, then you accept that there is no action ( action, not inspectors on good roads with hotel beds ready every night).

With all the money the Saddam makes into his own account selling all his oil!

Don't you remember seeing him on TV some seven years ago, (could be more) showing us two nuclear triggering devices he had, those necessary and so hard to get (supposedly) to detonate some very pure uranium ? Uranium which, then, was said not hard to get.

IMO the UN will say "no go". And it won't even be hara kiri for them.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News