SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 48.32-0.8%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: steve harris who wrote (170445)8/31/2002 11:21:24 AM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
Re: are you talking about the P4 wasting time clocking thru a 20 stage pipeline?

No, that's a whole other problem of the P4 design. Besides the long pipeline, P4 has only 6 execution units (pipelines), while Athlon has 9.

Even if an ideal series of insttructions were to let P4 keep it's long pipelines filled, Athlon can still do 50% more work, per clock.

The funny thing is that Athlon, with its additional instruction units, would probably benefit much more from hyperthreading than P4, which is maxed out by a single thread far more often.

If Intel does manage to get a lot of software re-optimized for hyperthreading, Athlon may end up being the main beneficiary.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext