Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 36.28

+0.6%

Dec 18 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: steve harris who wrote (170434)	8/31/2002 10:33:04 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Steve, Re: "It's obvious the benchmark was changed." It is obvious that it has changed. They changed the name, didn't they? They changed some of the applications, didn't they? The whitepaper describes changes in the testing methodology, too. The real issue is whether the changes accurately reflect the usage model that Bapco wanted to implement, or was special treatment given to Intel's implementations? Like Burn2learn suggested, I believe that AMD's absence in the committee prevented them from having a say in how the benchmark is put together. As a result, more of Intel's suggestions made it into the final revision. Now that AMD has a presence, SysMark 2003 might implement a few more scripts and filters that favor the AMD platform. wbmw

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next