If you felt that the behaviors in Part One deserved only a "tepid" response, I can see that those Part Two participants who felt the behaviors were, shall we say, untepidly condemnable, and argued their case to you, would seem "unattractive" to you.
I'm sorry if I was among those who you felt "peppered you" with PM's, and I'll be more careful in the future about both tone and content. I did let it all hang out when talking to you, that's true.
I suspect from what you write that X's comments are mostly based on your reports to her about those who wrote to you.
The subject is now how you got peppered with pleading or otherwise discomfiting PM's, and that Rambi, whose first name I used, got one phone call, and that iyo and X's, that is as "unattractive" as what CH did to Poet and others.
I assume you engaged in PM's with X and possibly others in CH's camp, but they were of a different tone--one more congenial to you. That would be only natural, of course. |
