PART TWO.
I'll answer you, though.
Although I wouldn't have had X reveal that I sent a few (she suggested I emailed her "without stopping", lol, later changing it to perhaps seven to nine PM's and em's total (?), which it wasn't, but what's a difference of three or four em's between friends? ) unwelcome emails to X when she had freaked out (we were both very upset), it turned out to be an elucidating exercise for the thread.
NB: X completely freaked out at a few messages she didn't want to read. The subject we were discussing was shocking to both of us, and I understand she was as upset as I. She threatened to go 3D. In lawyerspeak that we assumed meant some sort of suit. I may be dumb, but my husband is definitively not, and it was his understanding, too. That was no unintentional ambiguity.
That's now known, and is a nice irony.
And...X's freakout threat to go 3D was over what? --
What, compared to the weeks, months, of public sexual allusion and claims of a sexual relationship, threats to reveal personal life-details, to which Poet was subjected by CH, who had gone so frightenly far in his compulsion as to threaten a lawsuit so he could keep on doing it, who had ignored her pleas to leave her alone, who knew she suffered from PTSD, who knew she was frightened, whose husband pleaded with him to leave her alone... and whose plight X mocked, and whose persecutor X painted as the victim.
It is a good thing, imo, that this contrast has been exposed. A handful of non-sexual emails over an emotional issue involving a third party over a couple of days gives her a freakout that justifies posting two people's private lives to others and threatening to go 3D. And yet, she mocked Poet's situation.
I think it's good that that's known.
What has been pasted concerning me, personally, and about a third party, by X, to others, makes NOTHING, I assure you, JCD, NOTHING, of the piddling information she's now disseminated that, very upset, I behaved, for a couple of days, in anger and frustration, for reasons we couldn't go into, immaturely and emotionally.
"Harassed"? The world's briefest "harassment." If the word weren't so trendy, she wouldn't have even thought of applying it to the situation.
Though I'm sure she felt upset for that brief period, as did I. And I do regret having sent her a single unwelcome message that upset her, ever.
I don't expect for a minute that you will be convinced. You have been a trivializer of CH's behavior, and I fully expect you to continue to do with mine as you did about my, but not Rambi's or your wife's, use of Rambi's first name.
It would be nice to be surprised, but.... |
