SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TigerPaw who wrote (292693)9/3/2002 6:48:48 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
The White Boyz House just can't seem to even talk to each other.....they are idiots....

White House in Disarray Over Cheney Speech
Julian Borger in Washington
Monday September 2, 2002
The Guardian

George Bush has moved to distance himself from his vice-president after it was revealed that a
sabre-rattling speech on Iraq by Dick Cheney was made without clearing key points with the White House.

In a clear sign of disarray at the top of the US administration it has emerged that Mr Cheney may have
gone too far in a bellicose address last week in which he dismissed out of hand the usefulness of pushing
for weapons inspectors to be allowed back into Iraq.

That disarray inside the Bush team was compounded by renewed reports in the US press last night that
Colin Powell was planning to leave his job as secretary of state at the end of the president's first term,
potentially threatening Mr Bush's re-election chances in 2004 by robbing him of a popular and moderate
ally.

Mr Powell's recommendations for the administration to take a more multilateralist line in foreign policy
have repeatedly been ignored.


In an interview with the BBC broadcast yesterday, Mr Powell argued that UN weapons inspectors
should be sent back to Iraq as a "first step" towards dealing with the threat posed by Saddam Hussein,
echoing the position taken by Britain and the European Union.

Those comments directly contradicted the speech by Mr Cheney to US war veterans last Monday. In
that he said the inspectors "would provide no assurance whatsoever" of Iraqi compliance with UN
disarmament resolutions, and instead increase the danger by providing "false comfort".

A European diplomat said: "As far as we can tell, the Cheney speech was a freelance job which had not
been cleared with other agencies." The diplomat believed that included Mr Bush's national security adviser,
Condoleezza Rice.


That impression was reinforced by a report in Newsweek magazine yesterday in which the White House
chief of staff, Andy Card, said that the president had not authorised Mr Cheney's language on inspections,
and it was toned down in a second version of the speech delivered later in the week.

The report also quoted administration sources as saying that Mr Cheney had failed to check the facts
behind his allegations against Iraq with the CIA and that the state department never saw the final text of the
speech.

The implied criticism of Mr Cheney came as Tony Blair faced continuing pressure to use his influence to
press for re-engagement with the UN over Iraq, as well as further warnings that he does not have Labour
movement backing for a pre-emptive attack on Saddam Hussein.

Nelson Mandela is reported to have called Mr Bush directly to urge against a war and is also keen to
persuade Mr Blair against such a move.

The Conservative party leader, Iain Duncan Smith, urged Mr Blair to make a public case for a
pre-emptive attack. The evidence on Saddam Hussein's weapons and intent existed but the debate had
been allowed to "drift" by the prime minister, he claimed.

The issue of weapons inspectors is at the centre of the debate within the Bush administration between
hawks, led by Mr Cheney and the defence secretary Donald Rums feld, who believe the US should go it
alone in toppling President Saddam and moderates, led by Mr Powell and a phalanx of prominent figures in
the Republican party, who want to pursue the quarrel with Iraq through the UN.

Opinion polls yesterday showed the US public to be overwhelmingly on the side of the moderates. In a
Newsweek survey, 81% said it was important to gain the formal support of the UN for military action and
86% said it was important to get support from most of Washington's European allies.

Diplomats in Washington believe that the White House is considering approaching the UN security
council to seek a new ultimatum for Iraq to readmit weapons inspectors, a course of action advocated by
the EU last week.

Any future UN ultimatum will be hamstrung by the administration's oft-repeated intention to pursue
"regime change" irrespective of UN inspections, removing President Saddam's incentive to comply. Mr
Bush is due to address the UN general assembly on September 12, by which time the White House is
hoping to have clarified its policy.

W is one dumb son of a b....
He doesn't know anything about the world except that his pop totally screwed up the war and he's gonna make it right...AHAHAHAHAHAHA
CC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext