SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Mirant Corporation (MIR)
MIR 25.97+7.0%Jan 9 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bruce A. Thompson who wrote (728)9/4/2002 3:46:47 PM
From: RCMac  Read Replies (2) of 903
 
SO they are locking you into a $2.88 price, basically at their option, not yours.

In other words, if you tender you are giving Main Street an illiquid OTC option to buy your shares.

Giving, without consideration, what you could sell for a price on the CBOE, etc., and have more flexible terms (including, e.g., the right to later terminate the option by buying it back at its then market price).

Silly and offensive, although they are counting on some people being dumb enough to fall for it.

There used to be a nasty little game like this, in which the scamsters would make a tender offer for some small percentage of a small company's stock, at a price 30% or so BELOW market. (Anyone who really cares could find some discussion of one such scheme on the LGND board maybe 3-4 years ago.)

Why would anyone tender? No one with any sense, but apparently a few small shareholders would get the pages of legalese headed "Tender Offer" and "We offer to buy . . . ", and would pack up their certificates and send them off without checking the price. And the scamsters paid what they'd promised to pay, immediately resold in the market at a 30% or whatever profit, and went on to the next game.

Stupid; but one thinks of P.T. Barnum. The game apparently worked well enough that there were a fair number of these.

I think I remember that the SEC stamped this out, maybe 3-4 years ago, with a new reg or a ruling. (My guess is that this one is designed to skate around that SEC ruling.)

--RCM
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext