SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Placer Dome, Las Christinas- who owns it?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: virginijus poshkus who wrote (13)7/19/1997 8:33:00 AM
From: Islander   of 68
 
You can make innuendos of poltically motivated backroom dealings all you want, but this is NOT what is happening. This is a procedural issue - and a procedural issue only. If you read the ruling more than "briefly" as well as all the other rulings that precede it, you will discover that Mael and thus KRY have been recognized as legitimate and legal owners of the concessions by the Supreme Court and that this same 5 judge Supreme Court PAC ordered this to be published in the official Government Gazette, earlier this summer. What is happening now is that Mael is successfully petitioning that the Ministry of Mines' awarding of permits to CVG/Placer be rescinded.ALL of the petitions were accepted by the Supreme Court, eleven by admission, and three by appeal which in Venezuela is again a procedural issue and does not imply the 'overturning' of any prior decision or favourable ruling toward CVG/Placer as it would in the US. All of these petitions will now go before the 5 Judge Supreme Court PAC which has ruled three times in Mael/KRY's favour and, to repeat, ordered the publication of KRY's ownership in a special edition of the official Government Gazette. This has been published. For you to imply that now the removal of Ministry's permits to CVG/Placer will not be enforced by the Supreme Court PAC, due to some corrupt backroom dealing, when the whole investment world is watching would be shocking, and in light of Judge Acuna's recent attempts to 'clean-up' the country's bribery and corruption image, and in light of the previous PAC rulings in favour of MAEL, is ludicrous. IMHO, this will never happen, and Placer's palsied attempts to put their own favourable spin on last week's Acuna rulings, is truly a last gasp.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext