Can you imagine having a "serious" discussion as to whether or not we are "real"!
Yes. I can direct you to a thread where such discussions are common. :-)
But that may not count, because the ..... , whatever, there aren't real. Or so the whatever say.
But why would you want to be real? It's so PAINFUL! And so DULL!
When they claim that other is unreal, tnhey are really projecting a safe way of saying that they do not feel "real", and are not being treated as "real".
Now when you - if you are a you - say - type, actually - well, OK, induce electromagnetic oscillations in the non-existent - see, unreal? - aether (I'm starting to lose track of what I wanted to say) - oh, forget it, you get the idea. Right?
Oh. Continuing, when you do whatever that meant, aren't you assuming - whatever that means and whoever "you" are - that "you" are capable of reading "their" "minds"? Assuming "you" and "they" exist, of course, and that "you" and "they" have "minds". Or at least "they".
Did I do a satisfactory channeling of Mr. P? Assuming "I" and "Mr. P" are "real", of course. |
