Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: stockman_scott who wrote (43456)	9/12/2002 12:07:11 PM
From: SirRealist	Read Replies (1) of 281500

>>They want Saddamism without Saddam. He is no longer their man. That is why they call for "regime change".<< I understand this. This was GHWBush's gamble. It failed. It's also why the Prez is careful not to say a democratic Iraq. 'Regime change' permits another strongman govt. >>According to former weapons inspector Scott Ritter: "There is no way the Iraqis are going to let in the inspectors now . . . why would they let in the inspectors to spy on them, target them more effectively and then be used to manipulate justification for war?"<< Because the other option is another bloody defeat that could imprison or kill the Hussein family.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next