Bob,
Generally when faced with an argument for which they have no suitable debating points with which to counter the truth, neocons, old cons, conservative pundits and rabid fascists like Ann-thrax Coulter revert to childish and screechy ad hominem attacks, impugning the character of the person presenting the irrefutable debating argument.
Here's your effort at a comeback:
Celebrity self-promoter
talking head
Get back on your meds
your paranoid delusions
good boy
take your meds
guys in white coats
Not only are you avoiding the point, changing the subject and engaging in a personal attack, you also seem to not realize how weak your argument appears to readers when you revert to such cliched, hackneyed and tired tripe for your talking points. Readers here are laughing, Bob. But not at the jokes.
Cheerio! Ray
"It's as if somewhere early in life, Bush decided that in talking to most Americans you don't have to reason, just try to press the right buttons." --Norman Mailer (why, it's as if you've taken your method out of Shrub's playbook.) |
