SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bilow who wrote (43562)9/12/2002 7:05:22 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
Say, Carl, why don't you wait until at least a year has gone by before rewriting history?

Before Afghanistan, we received help from Britain, and a little lip service from NATO and the UN -- just as we are in the process of getting now. The same people who are predicting Iraq will be a quagmire predicted Afghanistan would be a quagmire. Remember "the brutal Afghan winter" and "the fearsome Afghan warrior, death of empires"? The Taliban (who are not Arabs, btw) were supposed to have fanatic support from all the Pushtuns. And the surrounding countries (I presume you refer to Pakistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Russia) cooperated, not because they favored the idea, but because we exercised some friendly persuasion. Friendly persuasion works in the Middle East too, Carl.

Watch what they do, not what their diplomats say. Qattar signed the Arab League opposition and sent its diplomats out to oppose us. So if they're refusing to aid us, why did CENTCOM just move forward to Qattar? Hint: maybe they're really aiding us.

As for US public opinion, it's for going into Iraq to oust Saddam, according the latest Pew poll, 64% favor it. That's more than favored the first Gulf War.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext