Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: stockman_scott who wrote (43515)	9/12/2002 8:18:04 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) of 281500

I wish I had seen your post 10 minutes ago... I just caught the tail end of the interview with Ritter (when O'Reilly asked him about the $400,000) As for inspectors "spying" for the US, so far as I'm concerned Iraq LOST THE WAR. That means we (the US as a proxy for the UN) have THE RIGHT to see anything we need to see that has military significance. This is ESPECIALLY the case when the US has borne the brunt of "containing" Saddam's ambitions. If that's "spying", then so be it. You can bet that other non-US inspectors were intensely "debriefed" by their own intelligence agencies. You can't really "spy" on a nation that has nothing to hide. Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next