Apple Inc. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.

AAPL 259.95

-0.4%

Jan 14 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jonkai who wrote (34916)	9/13/2002 1:26:49 PM
From: Doren	Read Replies (3) of 213182

Sorry, I just don't buy it. 1)other reviews like from Barefeats are littered with notes saying they didn't use multi processor aware tests and didn't use altivec Barefeats is a known Mac centric site. I don't buy the implied PC bias in your statement here. 2) Mac NightOwl is also Mac centric. Please note that the Photoshop test is a suite of tests put together by Apple. 3) Yes, I'm talking one processor to one processor. And I'm also talking Athlon rather than Pentiums because anyone familiar with these processors knows that for the last few years Athlons have been stomping Pentiums in the FPU catagory. The very catagory that Steinberg tested. Mac centric sites routinely test a dual processor Mac against a single Pentium and proclaim victory. You rarely see a dual Athlon against a dual Mac. Basically you can find proof all over that one processor is faster than another. Most mean nothing. When a Mac Centric site says a PC processor is faster I tend to believe them. Conversely when a PC centric site says Macs are faster I tend to believe them. And some sites seem to be more free of bias than others such as DV, those generally have more credability with me. I also have experience with my own machines. I'm still primarily a Mac user, and have been one for 7 or so years. I have 11 Macs and 1 PC. But facts are facts. you are trying to build a mcDonalds across the street from another mcDonalds..... worse you are trying to charge more for kludgy burgers that takes twice the energy to cook then sell them to McDonald's customers who are know what the "real thing" is..... In any business some clients are more trouble than profitable. Dumb companies dump these clients. Smart companies raise the prices they charge these clients until the profit margin is acceptable. I sometimes DOUBLE the price I charged to problem customers. Most don't care at all and we both came away happy. Why not build some overpriced PC's for the curious??? What the heck would it hurt as long as Apple makes a profit? I can't understand why anyone would object to such a thing even if Apple is your whole life and you have an emotional bond to the PPC? Why the heck would you care as long as you could get your Mac with your PPC?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next