Drumbeat of war drowns out concerns of average Americans
"….ledgers have gone from black to alarming red. Surpluses that were
once supposed to finance the onrushing retirement of the baby boom
generation have disappeared, replaced by recurring deficits projected to
total $229 billion over the next four years.
The price of war? Not really. Spending related to the attacks of
Sept. 11 accounts for about 10 percent of the loss of previously anticipated surpluses,
according to Congressional Budget Office figures."
Posted on Fri, Sep. 13, 2002
twincities.com
BY MARIE COCCO
Syndicated Columnist
The public prayers are finished, the saturation coverage wrung out, the documentaries shelved in history's library awaiting time's critique.
America wakes today to the usual clatter, the humdrum of workday worries punctuated by the presidential beating of war drums.
It is hard to remember when some other rhythm was heard. War is replacing remembrance, even as the nation seems dazed and divided by the speed with which an old
enemy, Iraq, has re-emerged.
We are told we must engage in a permanent, global war. Yet most of us are asked to pay no price, bear no burden. The home front remains a disengaged place. And in this
place, the sense of national purpose that sprung from the events of Sept. 11, 2001, finds its opposite in national neglect of everything else.
This is nothing like World War II, when women worked the factories. When men who remained behind were willing conscripts for civil defense. When sacrifice was asked, and
made.
In this year since the terrorists struck, the everyday concerns
of average Americans have been pushed aside. Not because of a deliberate
plan to dedicate ourselves to some
larger purpose. But because of the deliberate scheme of public
officials to avoid responsibility.
The federal government's ledgers have gone from black to alarming red.
Surpluses that were once supposed to finance the onrushing retirement
of the baby boom generation have disappeared, replaced by recurring deficits
projected to total $229 billion over the next four years.
The price of war? Not really. Spending related to the attacks of Sept. 11 accounts
for about 10 percent of the loss of previously anticipated surpluses, according to
Congressional Budget Office figures.
The cries of workers whose retirement savings were looted by corporate
crooks or decimated by stock market losses were heard, briefly,
above the din of war talk. Yet Congress is now busy diluting even
the pallid pension-protection measures that lawmakers introduced in the
spring. Even Sen. Edward M. Kennedy's effort to limit - but not
ban - a corporation's ability to use company stock for its 401(k) matching
contributions has been blunted. Thanks, lobbyists.
Meanwhile, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, the federal agency
that insures the old defined-benefit pensions that are meant to give workers a
guaranteed, steady income in retirement, reports a record jump in the number
of private pension plans that are underfunded. That is, they do not currently have
assets sufficient to pay promised benefits. In 2000, 87 plans reported they
were underfunded. In 2001, that tripled to 261. Stock market losses and low
interest on investments are the chief culprits.
And what of today's retirees?
They are struck, again, by the blow of HMOs pulling out of Medicare.
Or they are stuck paying higher charges to those HMOs that remain.
Next year an estimated 200,000
elderly people will lose HMO coverage, bringing to 2.4 million the number
dropped since 1998. The managed-care industry was promoted as the answer
to Medicare's every problem. The answer has proved wrong. No one comes forward
with another.
Even the stooped grandmothers, with their tales of splitting pills
in two so as to afford their prescriptions, have gotten the official brushoff.
Prescription drug coverage for
Medicare beneficiaries is another priority pushed down the list.
By year's end, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimates
that about 2.2 million Americans who were thrown out of jobs by the terrorist
attack or by the economic doldrums that preceded and now follow it.
are expected to run out of unemployment benefits before finding work
During the recession of the early 1990s, Congress moved
four times to make sure benefits kept flowing to laid-off workers.
So far in this downturn it has acted only once, and only grudgingly.
Perhaps we are at a juncture of history where there can be one,
and only one, priority - national security. But no one has explained this to us, or asked for perseverance on
all others.
No one has come right out and said forget about your standard of living,
your retirement hopes, your ability even to pay for drugs you need to stay alive.
When this week's tears finally dry, it is time to look clearly at this failure,
and demand an explanation - or action.
Cocco (e-mail: is cocco@newsday.com) is a columnist for Newsday, 235 Pinelawn Rd., Melville, NY 11747. Distributed by the Washington Post Writers Group.
© 2001 pioneerpress and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved.
twincities.com |
