SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Edscharp who wrote (80165)9/14/2002 9:23:39 PM
From: mmmary  Read Replies (1) of 122087
 
Ed, our posts, readers opinions here don't matter

what really matters is not what a few readers here think but what Judge Dearie thinks. What matters is how Tony's attorney presents his case in court. It doesn't matter how I present what I believe to be his case here. The members of SI won't be making up the jury box. I don't even have any of the evidence for the other charges except the public accusation in regard to 911. I couldn't present a case if I wanted to.

I personally believe that the governments case is probably not that strong because they felt they had to throw in bogus 911 charges. I'm pretty sure they KNEW he had nothing to do with 911. The government knew no one shorted 911. The government probably or at least should have read his thread and seen what he felt about 911. The goverment knew he was trying to help them look for funny trades. The government knew he didn't liquidated any accounts or add any short positions. At least the government is now saying he had nothing to do with 911. Will they be backing down from teh charges in the indictment as well? We shall see.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext