SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dayuhan who wrote (44105)9/15/2002 6:48:25 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
After examining your arguments, Steve, I have decided you have a point. Maybe we should start our "Preemptive Invasions" with an easier target. So here is my recommendation.

TEN REASONS WHY WE SHOULD INVADE FRANCE INSTEAD OF IRAQ.

10) It's a nicer climate, the troops won't get all hot and sweaty.

9) We already have an Army in Germany. We just turn the Tanks south.

8) The French Army is experienced at surrendering.

7) The Germans will loan us their old invasion plans.

6) Easier occupation. More of them speak English.

5) Much better food in Paris than Baghdad.

4) When the troops stop to eat, they won't get sand in their food.

3) The troops will find the women to be much more fun.

2) We have already beaten Iraq, we have never beaten the French.

AND THE NUMBER ONE REASON WHY WE SHOULD INVADE FRANCE INSTEAD OF IRAQ?

1) No need to install a new Government!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News