Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (44170)	9/15/2002 4:44:08 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Too lame and desperate even to be worth Fisking, wildly trying to claim everybody in the 'War! But Diplomacy First!' camp as an opponent of the President. Well, I have a news flash for you, Bush is now in the 'War! But Diplomacy First!' camp himself, and all these so-called opponents are right behind him. Jim Baker is supposed to be an opponent of invasion? Here's what he said today. Does this sound like opposition to you? The president made it sufficiently clear, I believe, that he intends to go forward, with or without a new resolution from the Security Council. "By heritage and by choice," he said, the United States will stand up for security "and for the permanent rights and hopes of mankind." Acting alone or with a few key allies will make the undertaking more costly -- politically, economically and in terms of other U.S. foreign policy interests. But, sadly, doing nothing is potentially the most costly strategy of all.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next